❧ NOTE FROM THE EDITOR ❧
Welcome to the second letter.
If you are reading this, you survived the first one and chose to remain, which means you are either genuinely curious or simply forgot to unsubscribe. Either is welcome here. The gazette does not interrogate motives. It only asks that you sit still for a few minutes and let Friday afternoon be briefly unusual.
A few things are different this week. The welcome letter you received last time was an introduction: a man in a cafe in Chișinău explaining, with some embarrassment, what he had built and why. From this issue onward, the gazette assumes its proper shape. You will find here four things, always four, in the same order, and they will arrive every Friday at the same hour for as long as the editor can sustain the discipline of sending one good letter a week, which is, it turns out, considerably more difficult than sending five mediocre ones.
The four things are: a fragment of something worth reading, carried here from a book that stopped me mid-sentence. A practice, which is not a life hack and not a productivity trick but a small act of deliberate living that you may attempt this week or ignore entirely without consequence. A clue, which is part of a longer mystery I will explain in a moment. And a postcard, written in present tense from wherever I happen to be, which is my way of proving that the editor is a real person in a real place and not a content engine with literary pretensions.
One more thing. This issue marks the beginning of something the gazette calls The Idle Pantheon, and it will take twelve months to reveal itself fully. Each month, a single figure from literature, history, or philosophy will be unveiled: a patron saint of idleness, a vagabond, a holy fool, a refuser of the productive life. You will receive three clues across the month, each one a little less oblique than the last, and on the final Friday the figure will be revealed in full, with a portrait, a field guide, and a print you can order if you want to put an idler on your wall.
The first figure arrives this month. The first clue is below. Guesses are encouraged. Replies are read. Confidence is not required.
Now then. To the letter.
❧ I. THE FRAGMENT ❧
In Bohumil Hrabal's novel, an old man named Haňťa spends thirty-five years compacting wastepaper in a cellar beneath the streets of Prague, rescuing books from the pulping machine and reading them between loads. He carries home so many that the floorboards groan and the ceiling sags and the neighbours begin to worry about structural integrity. He does not care. He has found, in the damp company of condemned literature, a kind of paradise that the world above him, with its plans and schedules and productive afternoons, has never managed to provide.
He says he can be alone without being lonely, surrounded by his thoughts and his books, and that this is the only education worth having: the involuntary kind, the kind that happens to you when you are not looking. He calls it a "too loud a solitude," and he means it as a compliment, because the noise is the noise of centuries of human thought pressing in on him from every side, and he would not trade it for the quiet of a sensible life.
Hrabal wrote the novel in a single sitting, or so the story goes, which seems fitting for a book about a man who spent thirty-five years doing one thing with total, unhurried attention. The book is short. The cellar is deep. The floorboards are still groaning.
— Bohumil Hrabal, Too Loud a Solitude (1976)
I have a friend who works in an archive. Not a literary one; a folklore archive, full of magnetic tapes and phonograph cylinders and handwritten cards in fading pencil. He says the same thing Haňťa says: that the material teaches you if you stay long enough, that the education is involuntary, that the coffee is terrible and the company is better than anything upstairs. I believe him. I work there too. — L.U.
❧ II. THE PRACTICE ❧
This week, reread the first book you ever loved.
Not a book you think you should reread. Not the one your adult self considers respectable, or the one you mention at dinner parties because it makes you sound well-read. The one you loved before you knew what good taste was supposed to be. The one with the cracked spine and the cover you can still see when you close your eyes. The one that made you, at twelve or fourteen or seventeen, feel that the world was larger and stranger and more worth inhabiting than anyone had previously suggested.
Read it without irony. Without the urge to reassess it. Without your adult critical apparatus running in the background, scoring the prose and checking for problematic passages and wondering whether it "holds up." Let it be as good as it was the first time. It probably is. The book has not changed. You have, and you have been trained to distrust the enthusiasms of your younger self, which is one of the quieter injuries of growing up.
If the book turns out to be genuinely bad, you will know soon enough, and you will have lost only an afternoon. If it turns out to be as good as you remembered, you will have recovered something that the years of careful, critical reading very nearly buried: the capacity to be delighted without reservation by a thing made of sentences.
⌂ Estimated effort: one afternoon ☽ Estimated reward: disproportionate
❧ III. THE CLUE ❧
THE IDLE PANTHEON · No. I of XII The first figure will be revealed at the end of this month.
This is how it works: three clues, one per week, each a little closer to the name. The first clue is abstract, a description of the figure's philosophy. The second, next Friday, will be biographical. The third will be concrete enough that anyone who has read the right book will know. On the last Friday of the month, the full portrait arrives.
You are invited to guess. Reply to this email with a name, a hunch, a question. There is no prize beyond the satisfaction of having guessed correctly, which is, in the gazette's economy, worth more than most prizes.
Clue 1 of 3:
"He arranged the world into a hierarchy of three things, and put perplexity at the top. Below perplexity he placed madness, and below madness he placed the circus, and below the circus he placed everything the respectable world considers important, which is to say he placed it at the bottom and left it there.
He considered this ranking an achievement rather than a confession. He was, by every official measure, a failure: no employment, no property, no prospects, no interest in acquiring any of the above. He wore that failure like a decoration, pinned to a coat that had seen better decades. Those who loved him found in his company a freedom they could not find elsewhere. Those who did not love him thought him mad, which he would have considered a compliment, since madness occupied the second-highest position in his scheme."
He is fictional, and he is more real than most people you will meet this week.
☞ Guesses welcome. Reply to this email. The second clue arrives next Friday.
❧ IV. THE POSTCARD ❧
A monastery near Bucharest, noon. The gates are open today, the way they are only a few times a year, and the courtyard has filled with a crowd so dense it has become a single body breathing in the heat. Everyone is here to witness something ancient performed in the present tense: two women are being recognized as saints. One of them died less than fifteen years ago. She spent her years as a hermit in the mountains, and her closest follower testifies, with the calm of a person reporting the weather, that in certain moments of prayer she rose from the ground. Levitated. Simply left the earth for a while, and came back.
And yet. Some of us carry the weight of the world on our shoulders while the woman in the story being told from the altar carried none at all. Some find their lightness in the woods. Some find only the cogs of the ordinary week, turning.
Near me, a grandmother holds a small framed photograph of the hermit against her chest, the way you hold something that might, if you are not careful, float away.
— L.U.
❧ CLOSING NOTE ❧
That is the shape of the letter. Four things, every Friday, in this order. The Fragment will always come from a real book; I will not invent quotations or paraphrase vaguely. The Practice will always be small enough to attempt and useless enough to be worth attempting. The Clue will build across the month toward a figure worth knowing. The Postcard will be true; I will write it from wherever I actually am, not from wherever sounds more interesting.
If any of this pleased you, you need do nothing at all. The next letter arrives in seven days without your intervention. If someone you know would find this kind of thing tolerable, you may forward it to them; the gazette does not beg for referrals, but it does not refuse good company.
If none of it pleased you, the unsubscribe link is below and carries no hard feelings. A gazette about doing less should never make a person feel obligated to read it.
Until next Friday, at the hour of two.
Yours in idleness,
Leo Umilio
Editor, The Idle Gazette
idle.news